Historical data showing various vaccine programs & outbreaks

• Del Bigtree explains Wakefield’s research in this video.

1. His work was not a scientific "study." 

Wakefield et al actually published a "paper" in Volume 351, Issue 9103, P637-641 of the Lancet on February 28, 1998; titled Ileallymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Scientific papers are designed to answer a simple question. In this case the question was; do children with regressive autism have chronic enterocolitis? 

2. "His paper claimed the MMR caused autism." 

Wakefield et al's conclusions documented in his paper: "We identified associated gastrointestinal (GI) disease and developmental regression in a group of previously normal children, which was generally associated in time with possible environmental triggers."

He does NOT say the MMR vaccine causes autism or even that the GI disease was caused by the MMR. He answered the simple question that yes... GI disease and developmental regression was seen in a group of "previously normal children". Wakefield et al's conclusion is now validated with the weight of scientific data. 

We now know according to Harvard Review of Psychiatry’s paper, that gastrointestinal disease is closely related to autism; " microbiome-CNS signaling", "gut bacteria may contribute to ASD", "overlaps with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and autoimmunity", "microbiome growth", "Maladaptive behaviors correlate with GI problems", "dietary factors may play a role as secondary triggers of autism", "gastrointestinal dysfunction characterizes a subset of children with ASD", "immune reactivity to gluten", "affected activity of brain regions", "addressing GI problems", and on and on. 

Wakefield’s paper's conclusions were REPLICATED and proven true: Walker, S., Fortunato, J., Gonzalez, L., Krigsman, A. (2013). Identification of unique gene expression profile in children with regressive autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and ileocolitis. Source: PlosOne "Taken as a whole, the picture that emerges is one in which GI symptomatic children with ASD in whom cellular infiltrate is present in the ileum and colon have a distinct molecular signature that is consistent with the larger disease categories of gastrointestinal disease, and more specifically, overlaps with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and autoimmunity."

Krigsman et al. (2010). Clinical presentation and histologic findings at ileocolonoscopy in children with autistic spectrum disorder and chronic gastrointestinal symptoms. (Source: Libertas Academia) Conclusions: Patients with autism or related disorders exhibiting chronic gastrointestinal symptoms demonstrate ileal or colonic inflammation upon light microscopic examination of biopsy tissue. Further work is needed to determine whether resolution of histopathology with appropriate therapy is accompanied by GI symptomatic and cognitive/behavioral improvement.

3. "Wakefield was charged with "fraud", or "forged data"

The data in question was the pathology reports that showed gastointestinal disease. Wakefield was not in charge of evaluating the pathology reports in this paper that was the charge of Dr. John O' Leary an independent Dublin pathologist. Dr. O'Leary stands by his reports, and they are not challenged by the UK's General Medical Council (GMC).

The UK General Medical Council charged Wakefield with serious professional misconduct and sanction, Wakefield was found guilty by the GMC (General Medical Council, pg. 7 & 9).

Professor Walker-Smith was also charged with and found guilty of serious professional misconduct and sanction, just as Wakefield. The description of the charges were similar with one variation being the monies given to Wakefield via the Legal Aid Board (LAB). On appeal all of the GMC's rulings toward Walker-Smith were overturned. The UK High Court's Mr. Justice Mitting criticized the U.K. General Medical Council, stating its judgment had been "based on inadequate and superficial reasoning" (High Court Of Justice, 2010). 

The claims of the BMC were deemed false to which they did not appeal this decision. (Source: England & Whales High Court) Professor Murch's official charges were also serious professional misconduct and sanction. He was found guilty of professional misconduct but not of sanction.

On 9 November, David Lewis of the National Whistleblower's Center in Washington DC published a letter in the BMJ arguing that Wakefield did not commit research fraud. 

This comment typically refers to the clinical investigations carried out by Walker-Smith, which included colonoscopies, barium studies, and lumbar punctures (LP). On appeal this charge by the General Medical Council as being "not clinically indicated" (pg. 4) was overturned by the U.K.'s High Court Of Justice (High Court Of Justice, 2010). Source: http://www.ebcala.org/areas-of-law/vaccine-law/co-author-of-lancet-mmr-autism-study-exonerated-on-all-charges-of-professional-misconduct

It is also important to note that the children had a positive diagnosis of GI disease through this workup, and were appropriately treated. The parents gave full consent for the procedures and were satisfied with the diagnosis and subsequent treatment. These children were not managed appropriately by their general practitioners regarding their untreated colitis. Further the LP's were ordered to assess the function of the CNS, which is appropriate since we now know that autism is a brain (encephalopathy)/body disorder, and the vaccine strain of measles has been found in the CNS of patients with encephalitis (science references). Barium studies are routine in assessing the upper GI tract.

His co - author was exonerated because his insurance paid for the case. Wakefield ' s did not but he has filed defamation charges and it's looking positive. 

Also, why would he bring out a movie and more studies if he was lying? That seriously hurt his career but he cares more about the truth for the children.

Check out our Autism section for more info. 

MORE ON WAKEFIELD

Dr. Wakefield is a gastroenterologist. The so-called "study" was actually a paper, an observation, not a study.

He observed 12 children at the request of several parents. These children, according to the parents, regressed immediately following the MMR vaccine. Dr. Wakefield, along with several co-authors, concluded that the MMR appeared to cause intestinal issues and may contribute to other autism like symptoms, however, "more research should be done."

The paper was not retracted because of issues with the data, but rather because the funding was from a parent's group. In essences, it has never been "debunked."

He was quickly attacked by associates of media mogul Rupert Murdoch who's son James happened to sit on the board of Merck. Wakefield never went to jail. He still practices medicine here in the US. His study has since been duplicated more than 2 dozen times and dozens of other studies have confirmed that there is a link.

Professor John Walker-Smith, the co-author on Wakefield’s study, won his appeal against the UK’s General Medical Council regulatory board. This board originally ruled against him and Dr. Andrew Wakefield for their roles in the 1998 Lancet MMR paper. The board admitted their original conclusions were based on “inadequate and superficial reasoning and in a number of instances, a wrong conclusion.”

Dr. Wakefield was the victim of a massive smear campaign. All for making a discovery that would have changed the world's perception on vaccines. If word got out that the MMR contributed to gastrointestinal issues seen in autism, the MMR program would fail overnight.

What many people don't realize is that Dr. Wakefield has had the continued support of his "fraudulent" test families since 1998. Wakefield's partner who published the paper with him has since been exonerated and Wakefield is in the process of being exonerated.

It's important to also mention the CDC Whistleblower and the intentional destruction of data data on their MMR vaccine studies. And also the famous "Danish study" in which no autism/vaccine link was found was done by Paul Thorsen and his co-authors. Poul Thorsen is a wanted fugitive for 13 counts of wire fraud and 9 counts of money laundering. A federal grand jury alleges that Thorsen stole over $1 million from autism research funding between February 2004 and June 2008. The study he published found no correlation between autism and vaccines.

So who is the real fraud? Merck killed 40,000 people with their Vioxx lies. Any study put out by a pharmaceutical company cannot be trusted as it was designed, executed, and published by scientists who will make a profit off of that drug/vaccine. This is a HUGE conflict of interest. Merck is a BILLION dollar corporation. There is MUCH money to be lost if their vaccine programs fail.

It's also important to mention that Dr. Wakefield was NOT anti-vaccine and, in fact, his own children were fully vaccinated. He simply found a correlation with gastronintestinal issues, regressive autism, and the measles virus in the gut after MMR vaccination and he published a study on that with the recommendation that this issue be looked at more closely. And so began the massive smear campaign that would discredit him and ultimately land him in the USA. The vaccine industry was extremely successful in demonizing him in the eyes of the world at that time.

And since that time, many MANY children have suffered vaccine injury that ultimately led to their autism diagnosis. The government's own vaccine court has ruled in a few cases that certain vaccines were responsible for the child's regression into autism. Perhaps the most famous of these cases was the Hannah Poling case.

And thousands of families around the world (and especially in the US) continue to claim that their child regressed within days of certain vaccines (usually the MMR or the Dtap). Why should we not believe them? Why is their assessment of their child any less valid than your assessment of your child? They have nothing to gain by making these claims and they are risking their reputation as a sane person, in fact!

Most of these families will never make it to vaccine court. Their concerns over their child's new symptoms are quickly dismissed as "coincidence" by their doctor. The symptoms are not documented fast enough. Many parents are told it's normal to have a high fever, clinched fists, screaming, and even seizures after vaccines. And therefore there is no evidence to hold up in court. Hannah Poling's parents won their fight because her father was a practicing neurologist and her mother an attorney and registered nurse. They were extremely educated on the science and the law.

Dr. Wakefield ran out of money defending himself. His colleague had more money and was able to continue defending himself, so he was able to be completely exonerated. His initial findings were well-received and supported by the medical community until people started freaking out because he suggested that the MMR vaccination be split into three different vaccinations given at least one month apart. He never suggested that vaccines cause autism. He suggested that more research needed to be done.

Are Vaccines Vegan? 

Vaccines with fetal bovine serum:  

• DTaP vaccines: Infanrix, Kinrix, Pediarix, Pentacel
• Teen Tdap vaccines: Adacel, Boostrix
• Tetanus boosters: DT, dT, TT (no longer readily available)
• Hepatitis A
• Polio
• ProQuad – (MMR + V)
• Japanese Encephalitis
• MMR
• Rotateq
• Rabies
• Varivax
• Zostavax (shingles vaccine)

Source: (1)  http://www.forskautandjurforsok.se/docs/Forskarrummet/Serum/the-use-of-fetal-bovine-serum-ethical-or-sceintific-problem.pdf)

Non-Kosher Ingredients and the Vaccines that contain them:

• Aborted Human Babies (Adenovirus, MMR, MMRV, DTaP-IPV, DTaP-IPV/HIB, Hep A, Hep A/B, Rabies, Varicella, Zoster/Shingles)
• Beef in the form of bovine, calf, fetal bovine extract and serum (Adenovirus, DTaP, DTaP-IPV, DTaP-HepB-IPV, DTaP-IPV/Hib, Hep A, IPV, MMR, MMRV, Rabies, Rotavirus, TDaP, TD, Typhoid, Varicella, Yellow Fever, Zoster/Shingles, Japanese Encephalitis)
• Chicken in the form of chick embryo, fibroblasts, egg protein, ovalbumin (Influenza, MMR, MMRV, Rabies, Yellow Fever)
• Pork in the form of porcine gelatin( Influenza, Rotavirus, Zoster/Shingles)
• Insect in the form of Spodoptera frugiperda cell protein. (Influenza)
• Dog in the form of MDCK (Madin-Carby canine kidney cells) (Influenza)
• Monkey in the form of Vero cells from African Green Monkey cells. (DTaP-IPV, DTaP-HepB-IPV, IPV, Japanese Encephalitis, Rabies, Rotavirus, Smallpox) 
• Shark squalene (Influenza)
• Guinea Pig cell cultures (Varicella)
• Hamster ovary cells (Zoster/Shingles)
• Army Worm (influenza) 
• Human in the form of albumin, albumin serum, urea (Adenovirus, DTaP-IPV, MMR, MMRV. Rabies, Smallpox, Varicella, Zoster/Shingles)

Gelatin is an animal protein made by boiling the collagenous material from animal bones, hides, and skins. Pig and cattle. Source: (2) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2480758/

Looking at the excipient list of vaccines, we can quickly see that every vaccine may be contaminated with at least one animal retrovirus family, all of which have been associated with cancers, chronic liver disease, AIDS, ALS, ME/CFS, and autism. Source: (3) https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf

All About Chick Embryos: 

Once the incubation begins, it takes on average 21 days for an egg to hatch into a cute little baby chick. When the living embryo is 11 days old, at that time they inoculate the chick with the virus. Approximately 3 days later, the eggs are chilled at 39°F (4°C) for at least four hours to reduce the amount of bleeding into the fluids. It is centrifuged – sometimes more than once – to “purify” the slimy solution, attempting to remove as much chicken blood and tissue solution as possible. Despite the effort, egg-based vaccines have residual chicken blood and chicken protein in the final product and it is subsequently injected into your arm.  



• The preparation is made from up to 5 embryos at a time. The embryo chickens selected are between 9 and 11 days old.
• The shell is opened, and the embryo is removed and placed in a petri dish. The head is cut off; removal of limbs and intestines is optional.
• The bodies are placed into a beaker and chopped into chunks with sterile scissors. Or, chunks of the bodies can be placed into a 50cc syringe and mashed by pushing the chunks through the tip of the syringe into a beaker.
• The tissue fragments are then washed several times to remove residual red blood cells.
• The residual cells are rinsed three times with a trypsin (enzyme) solution to separate cells.
• The flask containing 20-30 cc of the solution is swirled for about 2 minutes, and then the cell suspension is poured into a centrifuge tube containing up to 10cc of bovine serum.
• The cells are extracted from the bottom of the centrifuge tube and diluted with calf serum, or if cell growth is desired, fetal bovine serum is used.

All About Bovine Serum:

"Heavily pregnant cows are being slaughtered and the blood drained from their unborn calves' hearts to be sold for export - where it's used to produce vaccines and fake meat.

While the practice is legal, an industry whistleblower says it frequently causes unnecessary suffering, as the pregnant cows are confined in trucks or left standing for long periods.

Some even gave birth in transit or at the yards, a breach of animal welfare regulations. Pregnant cows are not supposed to be transported in their last month of gestation, without a vet certificate, or give birth after arriving for slaughter.

Last year, however, the Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI) recorded 22 births at meatworks and is also currently investigating a current complaint about the transport of pregnant cows.

The Herald on Sunday's source, who did not want to be named to protect their job, said while some farmers may legitimately have miscalculated a cow's pregnancy, others were acting out of greed.

"Some will leave the cow pregnant as long as possible to get a bigger fetus to get more blood, to get more money," the insider said.

And that cow has already given her life to produce milk, I just don't see how they justify it. I think it's an appalling practice."

The harvest of fetal bovine serum - the official name for calf fetus blood - is the latest in a string of animal welfare issues to hit the New Zealand farming industry, including last week's revelations about intensive winter feeding, and previous concerns about culling of bobby calves.

The serum industry has been operating in New Zealand for at least 25 years. Each calf heart produces about 300ml. Farmers are believed to receive about $50 extra per harvest. The serum is exported around the world for up to $2500 a liter.

The serum is used in pharmaceuticals and laboratories as a medium to grow cells - including in the formation of vaccines and, ironically, lab-grown meat.

Source: (4) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nig.gov.11971757 and (5)  https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/pregnant-cows-suffering-for-calf-blood-industry-insider/wx33sjgafje7jgcikqb6bza5yu//by)

More info: 

• Under the IPV section...  " the large number of monkeys (about 1500) needed to be sacrificed to produce every 1 million inactivated doses."
• "Animal-derived products used in vaccine manufacture can include amino acids, glycerol, detergents, gelatin, enzymes, and blood. Cow milk is a source of amino acids, and sugars such as galactose. Cow tallow derivatives used in vaccine manufacture include glycerol. Gelatin and some amino acids come from cow bones. Cow skeletal muscle is used to prepare broths used in certain complex media. Many difficult-to-grow microorganisms and the cells that are used to propagate viruses require the addition of serum from blood to the growth media." Source: (6) https://www.fda.gov/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/questionsaboutvaccines/ucm143521.htm

The herd immunity theory was originally coined in 1933 by a researcher called Hedrich. He had been studying measles patterns in the US between 1900-1931 (years before any vaccine was ever invented for measles) and he observed that epidemics of the illness only occurred when less than 68% of children had developed a natural immunity to it. This was based upon the principle that children build their own immunity after suffering with or being exposed to the disease. So the herd immunity theory was, in fact, about natural disease processes and nothing to do with vaccination. If 68% of the population were allowed to build their own natural defences, there would be no raging epidemic.

Later on, vaccinologists adopted the phrase and increased the figure from 68% to 95% with no scientific justification as to why, and then stated that there had to be 95% vaccine coverage to achieve immunity. Essentially, they took Hedrich’s study and manipulated it to promote their vaccination programs.

Search: MONTHLY ESTIMATES OF THE CHILD POPULATION “SUSCEPTIBLE’ TO MEASLES, 1900-1931, BALTIMORE, MD, AW HEDRICH, American Journal of Epidemiology, May 1933 – Oxford University Press)

Fast facts on herd immunity:

• Herd immunity can't work if vaccinated people can still carry and spread the disease. 
• The last lab experiment on herd immunity that I know of was Topley and Wilson 1923. They were unable to demonstrate Herd Immunity in their population of lab mice. All the more current herd immunity “studies” consist of mathematical constructs on unreliable data.
• with each national vaccine campaign, epidemiology, (and herd immunity) is modified benefiting some while actually placing another group at a higher risk than before. (7) https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/index.html and (8) http://jcm.asm.org/content/42/12/5604.short
• Proponents of herd immunity claim it is reached 95%. If that’s the case, everyone over 30 isn’t UTD with the current schedule, therefore the general population hasn’t reached 95% vaccination rates. 
• Herd immunity is based on natural, lifetime immunity- which you reach if you acquire a disease naturally. Vaccinations are good from 2-10 years, thus boosters - no lifetime immunity. 

Suspending fluid (e.g. sterile water, saline, or fluids containing protein); preservatives and stabilizers to help the vaccine remain unchanged (e.g. albumin, phenols, and glycine); and adjuvants or enhancers to help the vaccine to be more effective.

Common substances found in vaccines include:

• Aluminum gels or salts of aluminum are added as adjuvants to help the vaccine stimulate a better response. Adjuvants help promote an earlier, more potent response, and more persistent immune response to the vaccine. 
• Antibiotics are added to some vaccines to prevent the growth of germs (bacteria) during the production and storage of the vaccine. No vaccine produced in the United States contains penicillin.
• Egg protein is found in yellow fever and most influenza vaccines, which are prepared using chicken eggs.  This counts for a growing number of egg allergies. 
• Formaldehyde is used to inactivate bacterial products for toxoid vaccines, (these are vaccines that use an inactive bacterial toxin to produce immunity.) It is also used to kill unwanted viruses and bacteria that might contaminate the vaccine during production. Most formaldehyde is removed from the vaccine before it is packaged. Formaldehyde is the most commonly used inactivating agent (to “kill” the virus.) 
• Monosodium glutamate (MSG) and 2-phenoxy-ethanol are used as stabilizers in a few vaccines to help the vaccine remain unchanged when the vaccine is exposed to heat, light, acidity, or humidity.
• Thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative that is added to vials of vaccines that contain more than one dose to prevent contamination and growth of potentially harmful bacteria. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesaftey/concerns/thimerosal/index.html
• Chemicals commonly used in the production of vaccines include a suspending fluid (sterile water, saline, or fluids containing protein); preservatives and stabilizers (for example, albumin, phenols, and glycine); and adjuvants or enhancers that help improve the vaccine’s effectiveness. Vaccines also may contain very small amounts of the culture material used to grow the virus or bacteria used in the vaccine, such as chicken egg protein.
• The most important vaccine element is the adjuvant. It's designed to "enhance" immune reaction by remaining in the body with all ingredients, to travel and settle, to keep the antibody levels up indefinitely. When MDs say that the ingredients are harmless and expel, they're simply repeating what they hear from others.  They're clueless to the fact that these ingredients are lethal by default because they're designed to remain in the body.

Antigen: All vaccines contain an active component (the antigen) which generates the protective immune response.

Adjuvant: An adjuvant is an ingredient that helps retain the active component of the vaccine (antigen) at the injection site and attracts inflammatory factors and immune system cells to the injection site to improve the immune response to the vaccine. Aluminum is
the most common adjuvant. 

Excipients: Excipients are all substances in the finished product, other than the active ingredients. Excipients may have been used during the manufacturing process or in the finished pharmaceutical product to maintain quality. 

Preservatives: Preservatives stop unwanted contamination of a vaccine. They have been used in vaccines for many years. Serious adverse events have been associated with the use of these preservatives. 2-phenoxyethanol, Phenol, and Thimerosal are common preservatives. 

Stabilizers: Stabilizers stop chemical reactions from occurring in the vaccine and prevent the components from separating from each other or sticking to the vaccine vial during transportation and storage. Examples of stabilizers include sugars such as lactose and sucrose, amino acids such as glycine and monosodium glutamate (MSG), proteins such as recombinant human albumin (Recombumin®) derived from baker’s yeast or fetal bovine (cow) serum and gelatin, partially hydrolyzed collagen usually of porcine (pig) but can be of bovine origin.

Buffers: Buffers serve to resist changes in pH, adjust tonicity, and maintain osmolarity. The most commonly used buffer is sodium chloride (table salt).

Surfactants: Surfactants are a type of emulsifier. They assist particles in remaining suspended in liquid, preventing settling and clumping, by lowering the surface tension of the liquid. An example is polysorbate 80 (Tween 80®), made from sorbitol (sugar alcohol) and oleic acid (omega-9 fatty acid), which is also used in foods such as ice cream. Surfactants are also used in shampoos, toothpaste, inks, and fabric softeners.

Solvents: A solvent is a substance that dissolves another substance, creating a solution. The most common solvent used in everyday living, and vaccine manufacture, is water.

Residuals: Residuals are the remaining minute quantities of substances that have been used during the manufacturing or production process of individual vaccines. Residuals depend on the process used, which may have involved cell culture mediums, egg proteins, yeast, antibiotics such as neomycin or streptomycin, or inactivating agents such as formaldehyde. These substances are only present as traces and often measured as parts per million and parts per billion in the final vaccine formulation.

Animal-derived products: Some people have concerns about animal-derived products such as gelatin in vaccines. This may be for faith-based reasons or concerns about the safety of animal-derived products. More information on animal-derived products in vaccines can be found in the fact sheet National Immunisation Schedule vaccines and animal-derived products on our Written Resources webpage.

Diluents: A diluent is a liquid used to dilute a vaccine to the proper concentration immediately before administration. This is usually sterile water.