From the Vaccination Re-Education Discussion Forum Facebook Group!
From the Vaccination Re-Education Discussion Forum Facebook Group!
New information about this vaccine is being released constantly - please check back regularly for updated information. We will post new information as we are able.
In early 2002, after three major SARS epidemics, they began working on a CV vaccine. In 2012, they had about 30 different vaccines that “looked promising.”
They took the four best ones and gave them to ferrets. They all had great antibody responses, but then they were all exposed to the wild virus and every one of them died. (The same thing happened in the 1960s when they tried to develop an RSV vaccine, which is an upper respiratory illness very similar to coronavirus.)
Studies have suggested that coronavirus vaccines carry the risk of what is known as vaccine enhancement, where instead of protecting against infection, the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus.
... they looked closer and they realized that there are two kinds of antibodies that were being produced by the coronavirus. There are neutralizing antibodies, which are the kind you want, which fight the disease, and then there are binding antibodies. The binding antibodies actually create a pathway for the disease in your body, and they trigger something called … a paradoxical immune response or paradoxical immune enhancement. What that means is that it looks good until you get the disease, and then it makes the disease much, much worse.
Coronavirus vaccines can be very dangerous, and that’s why even our enemies, people who hate you and me — Peter Hotez, Paul Offit, Ian Lipkin — are all saying, ‘You got to be really, really careful with this vaccine.’” - RFK Jr.
This is from the study of the Pfizer vaccine. They are not making the vaccine from an isolated virus
It’s a genetic sequence they obtained from China.
Latest updates on covid-19 vaccines and informative commentary by Dr. Deisher, from her newsletter:
"There are many vaccine candidates in the pipeline for COVID-19; at least five utilize aborted fetal DNA in their development and/or manufacturing process.
Moderna’s mRNA-1273 (https://www.modernatx.com/modernas-work-potential-vaccine-against-covid-19) which is an mRNA vaccine using S protein to deliver the mRNA. That S protein is made using HEK293 cells. HEK stands for Human Embryonic Kidney and are cells originating from an abortion in the Netherlands in the 1970’s. The number 293 denotes that they came from the 293rd experiment. Although animal models indicated the trial vaccine can stimulate antibody production, Moderna bypassed animal safety testing and began human trials in March. It is important to note that there is concern in the medical and scientific community regarding skipping and rushing safety testing steps.
Past attempts at vaccine development for this virus family led to “immune enhancement” or “pathogenic priming.” Vaccinated animals were made more susceptible to severe disease and adverse outcomes when exposed to the wild virus, or similar viruses. Moderna has received a US government agency BARDA grant of $483 million to accelerate production of this vaccine. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550498/) China’s CanSino Biologics Ad5-nCoV is an adenovirus-based viral vector vaccine that also uses the HEK293 cell line.
The Johnson and Johnson unnamed candidate vaccine being developed by their subsidiary, Janssen Pharmaceutical, is also an adenovirus-based platform using the PERC6 cell line. PERC are human embryonic retinal cells taken from an abortion of a fetus at 18 weeks gestation. This is the first time a vaccine has been manufactured using the PERC6 cell line. The US Federal Government has awarded Johnson & Johnson over $400 million for the manufacturing of this vaccine.
The University of Pittsburgh is developing a recombinant subunit vaccine, PittCoVacc, based on the HEK293 cell. It would be administered via a skin patch.
An UK collaboration between Merck, the University of Oxford, and the Jenner Institute, has resulted in a 5th COVID-19 vaccine cultured on aborted human DNA—specifically the HEK293 cell line. Human trials of this vaccine, named ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, began, they announced plans to have 1 million doses available by Fall 2020.
Dr. Deisher has spoken often about the dangers of utilizing aborted fetal cells in vaccine manufacturing, which leaves the final product contaminated with fragments of human DNA. Exposure to this primitive DNA can lead to insertional mutagenesis, where the contaminating DNA fragments randomly insert into the child’s own DNA, causing mutations which can lead to cancer and autoimmunity.
In addition to concerns with the potential for insertional mutagenesis and autoimmune disease as a result of residual DNA fragments in these newly developed COVID-19 vaccines, as noted earlier, there is also concern that all of the COVID-19 vaccines are being rushed to market, bypassing very important animal safety testing, not using inert placebos in control groups, and rushing human trials, potentially missing critical side effects and unintended outcomes. Since the federal government has already stated they will approve COVID-19 vaccines for use under Emergency Use Protocols in the fall if they meet the barest of testing measures, it is deeply concerning that many thousands, if not millions, of individuals could be exposed to a vaccine that carries undiscovered risks and unknown benefits."
Recap: The last time they attempted to make a RNA vaccine, all the animals during animal testing died when exposed to the disease. They are skipping that this time. The vaccine they are giving everyone is NOT approved. It’s being given under Emergency Use Authorization. This download from the FDA talks about risks and requirements for vaccinating this unapproved vaccine under emergency authorization: https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
Another problem with coronavirus vaccines is that coronaviruses mutate very rapidly. Kennedy cites a recent Chinese study4 — “Patent-Derived Mutations Impact Pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2” — which was also reported in the New York Post5 April 21, 2020, in which they looked at the coronavirus strains found in hundreds of patients. They identified more than 30 different strains, 19 of which had previously not been seen. According to the authors: “Current genomic survey data suggest that single nucleotide variants (SNVs) are abundant … Here we report functional characterizations of 11 patient-derived viral isolates, all of which have at least one mutation. Importantly, these viral isolates show significant variation in cytopathic effects and viral load, up to 270-fold differences, when infecting Vero-E6 cells. We observed intrapersonal variation and 6 different mutations in the spike glycoprotein (S protein), including 2 different SNVs that led to the same missense mutation. Therefore, we provide direct evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 has acquired mutations capable of substantially changing its pathogenicity.” https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.14.20060160v2
It is SARS and they made it one genome sequence off. https://zenodo.org/record/4073131#.X-6BNy9Onit
Since viruses mutate frequently, the chance of any vaccine working for more than a year is unlikely. That is why the flu vaccine changes every year. Last year’s vaccine is no more valuable than last year’s newspaper.
mRNAis a “director” of changing DNA. Your dna encodes for a bunch of proteins. Each gene is like a blueprint for one protein. The body makes a copy of the gene from the DNA. This copy is called an mRNA and then we use that mRNA to make thousands of the same protein. This vaccine is an mRNA vaccine. So it "works" by adding to your body an mRNA that encodes for the antibody protein needed to fight covid. The mRNA is injected and our cells will produce the spike protein so an immune response is started. Cells ribosomes will read the code and produce the protein.
The problem with it is that our normal mRNA's breakdown after a few days and the body needs to make another one using your DNA. This makes sure you never get too much of one protein. But this vaccine mRNA is synthetic and has been altered so that it will not break down for months, maybe years. This can and like will cause huge problems in the body. Also, the antibody protein that this mRNA encodes for is VERY similar to a protein the placenta makes and many scientists are concerned that it will cause the body to treat the placenta like a foriegn invader and attack the placenta, rendering the women infertile.
Even the Moderna vaccine manufacturer describes it. It is genetic modification. https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/science-and-fundamentals-mrna-technology
Essentially it is genetic engineering of the human genome. That comes with variable consequences such as new hybrid diseases and unlocking new genetic mutations that we’ve never seen. Information here about how it works and the potential risks: https://www.bulatlat.com/2020/08/21/hazards-of-the-covid-19-vaccine/ “The fact that an entirely new RNA vaccine technology which has never been used before in humans is a danger signal that should not be ignored. Several of the US candidates (Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech, and Arcturus Therapeutics) are using this never-before-approved technology. Exogenous mRNA is inherently immunostimulatory, and this feature of mRNA could be beneficial or detrimental. It may provide adjuvant activity and it may inhibit antigen expression and negatively affect the immune response”
Also think of this... when changed, because a product has now altered your DNA, some suspect they actually have a legal claim to that part of you. This was one of the reasons GMO foods were produced... because you can’t patent nature, but change the genome a bit, and bingo! Sounds far fetched? Here’s some sources: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335060/
In 1980, the US Supreme Court ruled in Diamond v. Chakrabarty that genetically altered life can be patented. Here's an older article (2013) that briefly touches on this issue: https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/can-we-patent-life
Here are the two great articles on it:
mRNA does change your DNA via reverse transcriptase. There are several mainstream news articles stating that the coronavirus itself is mutating our DNA. It happens with RNA viruses so why wouldn't it happen with injected mRNA? S
This are the most in depth explanations we found of how the vaccine works and answered some questions about how mRNA can possibly affect the body.
"An RNA vaccine isn't a vaccine at all. It doesn't illicit an immune response. It has to be turned into a protein and it's the protein, in turn, that creates the immune response. A messenger RNA vaccine is actually Genetic Engineering. You'll have cells in your body that will produce protein to which your immune system will amount an immune response. That's called an auto-immune disease. The potential for this to go horribly wrong is enormous." - Dr. Andrew Wakefield https://www.bitchute.com/video/EwuxPbTj22lQ/
Traditional vaccine simply introduce pieces of a virus to stimulate an immune reaction. The new mRNA vaccine is completely different. It actually injects (transfects) molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into our cells. Once in the cells, the genetic material interacts with our transfer RNA (tRNA) to make a foreign protein that supposedly teaches the body to destroy the virus being coded for. Note that these newly created proteins are not regulated by our own DNA, and are thus completely foreign to our cells. What they are fully capable of doing is unknown.
Many experts question whether the mRNA technology is ready for prime time. In November 2020, Dr. Peter Jay Hotez said of the new mRNA vaccines, “I worry about innovation at the expense of practicality because they [the mRNA vaccines] are weighted toward technology platforms that have never made it to licensure before.” Dr. Hotez is Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology & Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he is also Director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development.
What’s in the new Covid vaccines? (check out Ashley Everlys explication below)
Well, that depends on the manufacturer. The manufacturers have not yet disclosed what toxins they contain.
Oxford, AstraZeneca, J&J are traditional vaccines
Pfizer and Moderna are nanotechnology and don’t contain the same amount of adjuvants.
Sodium and sugar are both ingredients in the Pfizer and Moderna one. The shot also contains PEG (polyethylene glycol) which is highly allergenic and the suspected reason of the severe reactions you keep hearing about.
Oxford’s AZD1222 vaccine is made from a genetically engineered virus that causes the common cold in chimpanzees. The virus has been modified to mimic the coronavirus.
It uses squalane as adjuvant. Oxfords placebo in testing is a meningitis vax.
Cell lines: There are dog cell lines in Fluvax. Dogs and other animals are known to have lots of corona viruses. “Coronaviruses are in every animal so if you ever had a flu vaccine you were injected with coronavirus” - Judy Mikovitch, in POC, (former National Cancer Institute Scientist, Former Head of Research at Whittmore Pettterson Institute, Former scientist at NIH, PhD in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology)
At least five of the candidates for COVID-19 vaccines use one of two human fetal cell lines: HEK-293, a kidney cell line widely used in research and industry that comes from a fetus aborted in about 1972; and PER.C6, a proprietary cell line owned by Janssen, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, developed from retinal cells from an 18-week-old fetus aborted in 1985. Both cell lines were developed in the lab of molecular biologist Alex van der Eb at Leiden University. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/abortion-opponents-protest-covid-19-vaccines-use-fetal-cells
The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine includes the following ingredients:
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine includes the following ingredients:
Taken from Ashley Everly (link to article below)
"Ingredient of concern: Modified mRNA.
COVID vaccines are the first vaccine to use modified (synthetic) mRNA technology. There is ongoing debate and concern amongst the scientific and medical community with regard to potential unknown effects of injecting lab-created genetic material into the body.
“…there are unique and unknown risks to messenger RNA vaccines, including local and systemic inflammatory responses that could lead to autoimmune conditions.
An article published by the National Center for Biotechnology Information, a division of the National Institutes of Health, said other risks include the bio-distribution and persistence of the induced immunogen expression; possible development of auto-reactive antibodies; and toxic effects of any non-native nucleotides and delivery system components.”
Source: Could mRNA COVID-19 vaccines be dangerous in the long-term? https://m.jpost.com/health-science/could-an-mrna-vaccine-be-dangerous-in-the-long-term-649253"
Typically, when mRNA is present outside of a cell, it degrades relatively quickly. In order to prevent this from happening, scientists encapsulated the mRNA in a lipid nanoparticle. How long the mRNA remains in the body to continue being translated into the viral spike protein, is unknown.
Ingredient of concern: Polyethylene Glycol (PEG).
Polyethylene glycol is one of the ingredients used for the lipid nanoparticle that protects the mRNA sequence. Traditional vaccines often contain a chemical substance like aluminum which provokes the immune system to attack the contents of the vaccine. Although mRNA vaccines do not contain aluminum or other traditional adjuvants, the proprietary PEGylated lipid nanoparticle designed by Pfizer is said to have “adjuvant activity”.
Additionally… “[Polyethylene glycol, or PEG] has never been used before in an approved vaccine, but it is found in many drugs that have occasionally triggered anaphylaxis—a potentially life-threatening reaction that can cause rashes, a plummeting blood pressure, shortness of breath, and a fast heartbeat. Some allergists and immunologists believe a small number of people previously exposed to PEG may have high levels of antibodies against PEG, putting them at risk of an anaphylactic reaction to the vaccine.”
Its too soon to know for sure but, WHO says that vaccine won’t work to combat CV
COVID-19 vaccines are NOT designed to prevent infection. As detailed in “How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged,” a “successful” vaccine merely needs to reduce the severity of the symptoms. They’re not even looking at reducing infection, hospitalization or death rates.https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/10/27/covid-vaccine-trials.as
The the FDA press release indicates that trial participants were followed for SEVEN days to prove effectiveness. SEVEN DAYS and declared effective for an infection that has an incubation period of up to 14 days. #becausescience Source: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-key-action-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-first-covid-19
The claim is that the COVID-19 vaccine is 95% effective. How did they determine this efficacy? This claim is based off of 170 participants in the trial. There were a total of 43,548 trial participants in the Pfizer vaccine trial. Of these 43,548, 170 developed symptoms of COVID-19 and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 within the two month monitoring period. Of these 170 participants, 162 were in the placebo group while 8 were in the vaccine group. What this study fails to mention is the other 43,378 trial participants, their reactions, their infection rates, tranmission rates, etc. Ashley Everly explains this (and more) really well in her article: https://everlyreport.com/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-covid-vaccine/
What are the warnings and reactions?
mRNA vaccines are a completely new type of vaccine. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed for human use before. In essence, we have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine. We have no idea if it will be effective or safe.
The mRNA molecule is vulnerable to destruction. So, in order to protect the fragile mRNA strands while they are being inserted into our DNA they are coated with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles. This coating hides the mRNA from our immune system which ordinarily would kill any foreign material injected into the body. PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been used in several different drugs for years. Because of their effect on immune system balance, several studies have shown them to induce allergies and autoimmune diseases. Additionally, PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been shown to trigger their own immune reactions, and to cause damage to the liver.
Pg 132 of the insert says no unprotected sex for 28 days due to reproductive safety risks (birth defects due to genetic manipulation) https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf
You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe COVID vaccine side effects. The government likely won’t compensate you for damages either https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html Under the PREP Act, companies like Pfizer and Moderna have total immunity from liability if something unintentionally goes wrong with their vaccines.https://www.news18.com/amp/news/buzz/americans-cant-sue-pfizer-moderna-in-case-of-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-heres-why-3190154.html
Normally a vaccine development takes 5-10 years. This type of mRNA vaccine has never been tested on humans before nor has any product of similar origin. The total testing time was 6 months-NOBODY has ANY idea what the long term side effects may be. Everyone who takes it becomes a long term side effects test subject.
A further description of risks and uncertainties can be found in Pfizer’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 and in its subsequent reports on Form 10-Q, including in the sections thereof captioned “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Information and Factors That May Affect Future Results”, as well as in its subsequent reports on Form 8-K, all of which are filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and available at www.sec.gov and www.pfizer.com.
Here is some of what we have heard about reactions so far:
There is also this study in mice suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced with vaccination. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335060/
Let’s look at the virus. How is it transmitted? What are the numbers? Is it really a pandemic?
There were no asymptomatic positive cases in 96.4% of the residential communities.
There is no need for a vaccine in persons already naturally immunized. Have your blood checked for COVID-19 antibodies.
Since the death rate from COVID resumed to the normal flu death rate way back in early September. substantial herd immunity has already taken place in the United States.
Therefore, at this point in time no vaccine is needed. The current scare tactics regarding “escalating cases” is based on a PCR test that because it exceeds 34 amplifications has a 100% false positive rate unless it is performed between the 3rd and 5th day after the first day of symptoms. It is therefor 100% inaccurate in people with no symptoms. This is well established in the scientific literature.
“Here’s my bottom line: I would much rather get a COVID infection than get a COVID vaccine. That would be safer and more effective. I have had a number of COVID positive flu cases this year. Some were old and had health concerns. Every single one has done really well with natural therapies including ozone therapy and IV vitamin C.. Just because modern medicine has no effective treatment for viral infections, doesn’t mean that there isn’t one.
Yours Always, Frank Shallenberger, MD, HMD” https://principia-scientific.com/about-informed-vaccine-consent-frank-shallenberger-md-hmd/
The PDF viewer below is an excerpt from Pfizer's clinical study. This section (220.127.116.11) is specifically about Exposure During Pregnancy (EDP) and there is also a section (18.104.22.168) about Exposure During Breastfeeding. You can download this excerpt by pressing "Download PDF" below, and you can find the full study here.
For those looking for data on the Covid 19 vaccine. I have managed to get ahold of a 1000 page report for the trial issued by Moderna. This report deals only with the following:
-45 participants age 18-55
-20 participants age 56-70
-20 participants age 71 or older
-Out of 193 potential participants, only 85 were deemed acceptable.
To be acceptable you can not have ANY MEDICAL condition, must have perfect BMI, and perfect blood pressure measurements. 56% of the people who applied were rejected.
Here's the results of the perfectly healthy ideal 85 people:
Age 18-55: 71% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 56-70: 50% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
Age 71+: 70% OF PARTICIPANTS HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION
How on earth is the general population (the 56% rejected for not being healthy enough) supposed to get this?
I will be more than happy to provide this report for anyone's review, but it is a large 27mb file. I have attached screenshots.
EDIT: Original link was removed already. It's a proprietary report. Here's a new link I have hosted on mega, but it's only a matter of time until they remove this one too:
How does an mRNA vaccine differ from other vaccines and natural viral infection?
1. Natural viral exposure via natural routes (i.e. mucus membranes):
Healthy immune system supported by proper nutrition detects virus and responds appropriately, immune system purges unwanted cellular waste, body is healthier and immune system stronger after virus is dealt with. Reducing your risk of cancer later in life.
2. Live virus vaccine, such as MMR (weakened viral exposure via unnatural route, injection):
Virus enters body through unnatural route. Immune system under-reacts (is burdened by) or over-reacts to, the contents of the vaccine (glutamate, human DNA, fetal bovine serum, gelatin, antibiotics, etc.).
Body either: (a) Develops symptoms of viral infection. Fever, rash, etc. This is the best possible scenario - the immune system is still able to respond somewhat appropriately to viral exposure and elimination pathways are still functioning well enough to purge.
Or (b) Body does not develop symptoms of viral infection, immune system does not properly respond. Body accumulates cellular waste (which is meant to be purged by virus) and toxicity from contents of the vaccine, accelerating the development of chronic illness. This may lead to cognitive damage (especially with measles vaccine virus in the presence of neurotoxic substances like aluminum from other vaccines), or chronic illness such as arthritis, type 1 diabetes, or other autoimmune disease.
3. Killed vaccine, such as DTaP (adjuvanted, dead virus exposure via injection):
Immune system does not properly respond to virus, cannot develop symptoms of natural viral infection. Instead, immune system reacts to adjuvant (typically aluminum) by properly identifying it as toxic. External symptoms of immune system reaction occur if not over-burdened and therefore suppressed. If immune system is unable to eliminate aluminum and other toxic contents of vaccine adequately, damage occurs which may be severe, short term, or chronic. Aluminum adjuvant slowly translocated from injection site to other organs and tissues of the body which can then lead to chronic autoimmune disease.
4. mRNA Vaccine, new technology (synthetic piece of virus’ spike protein’s genetic code):
Immune system response is triggered by an injected, artificial, mRNA sequence - mRNA code which is encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles with unknown ingredients, but is said to have some adjuvant activity (the immune system reacts to it, which means it is identified as harmful or toxic).
Typically, DNA in the nucleus of your cells is used to produce mRNA, and then that RNA is used to produce protein. Rather than a virus using cells to replicate, the synthetic mRNA injected into the body hijacks the natural translation process (converting RNA to protein), in order to create a homolog of the viral spike protein. The immune system then responds to the ongoing artificial generation of that viral spike protein, and makes antibodies.
- What kind of immune system response might be unique to mRNA vaccines? Answer: According to clinical trials, there appears to be a robust immune response to the mRNA vaccine candidates currently being approved, and we know for both Pfizer and Moderna, that their experimental vaccines have been “successful” at creating *binding* (non-neutralizing) antibodies, which have been documented time and time again to cause *enhancement* of disease (ADE)... but no one seems to care about this. Otherwise, we don’t really know yet, except a majority of trial participants end up with flu-like symptoms.
- What are the other ingredients in these vaccines? Answer: That’s apparently proprietary information. We don’t know.
- How long does this injected mRNA code continue to produce the viral spike protein in the body? Answer: We don’t know. All we know is that Pfizer and Moderna have figured out how to make it “more stable” than natural RNA, helping it last longer, and be “more stealthy”...
- What are the long term health effects of these vaccines...? Answer: We don’t know, and we won’t for a long time. There will be no long term testing before giving it to the public. The people will become the participants in a massive experimental trial, once it is distributed.
From an article by The Independent:
“Researchers have been attempting to trick the body's immune system using mRNA for decades, and the [C0VlD] vaccines would be the first successful implementation since research began in the early 1990s.”
Wow. First “successful” mRNA vaccine in 30 years, developed and tested in less than 9 months!! ......Amazing! GOOD LUCK!
The Independent: “What is C0VlD vaccine made of?” trends on Google as Pfizer and Moderna seek FDA approval.
Financial Times (paywall): Secret ingredients behind the breakthrough C0VlD vaccines
Moderna and BioNTech-Pfizer’s shots use same mRNA technology but with key differences.
Previous post regarding binding antibodies and enhancement of disease: https://thinklovehealthy.com/2020/11/21/new-strain-or-antibody-dependent-enhancement/
Moderna vaccine: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2022483
Here is a partial list of studies and articles that discuss the flu vaccine. They show: low efficacy, increased risk of other respiratory illnesses, increased hospital stays, T-cell immunity impairment, shedding, and other negative outcomes.
1. Does the flu shot vaccine decrease infection, hospitalization, pneumonia, and mortality? "The literature that did address hospitalization and pneumonia both indicated at best a small benefit of vaccination with low certainty of evidence." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677258/
2. “Vaccination may have little or no appreciable effect on hospitalisations (low‐certainty evidence) or number of working days lost.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6491184/
3. Chinese study showing 4.4 higher chance of getting an upper respiratory virus infection after getting the seasonal flu shot. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404712/
4. This study claims 36 percent increased risk for coronavirus. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126676/
5. Flu shot impairs T-cell immunity which is critical to fight against Covid-19 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3209321/
6. Even in cases when the flu shot may protect you from the flu symptoms caused by vaccine-matching strains, you are still able to carry them in your nasal mucosa and spread them. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.0300-9475.2004.01382.x
7. If you get the flu despite being vaccinated, you will be shedding the flu virus at increased rates, per this 2017 study. “We observed 6.3 (95% CI 1.9–21.5) times MORE aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.” https://www.pnas.org/content/115/5/1081.full
8. Negative nonspecific effects: https://www.cell.com/trends/immunology/fulltext/S1471-4906(13)00058-6
9. Activating the immune system repeatedly may eventually cause the body to attack itself in susceptible individuals. This occurs in a mouse model with this 2009 experiment. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008382
10. Public policy does not match the evidence. “The large gap between policy and what the data tell us (when rigorously assembled and evaluated) is surprising.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1626345/
11. Canadian study: People who got annual flu shots were getting the pandemic strain A/H1N1-pdm09 more often than the people who got no shot.
12. 2014 study with ferrets which confirmed the Canadian study above.
13. Post-vaccination risk of non-influenza respiratory pathogen was higher in children. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X18303153
14. Four epidemiologic studies showing that prior receipt of the flu shot was associated with increased risk of medically attended influenza A. https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?type=printable&id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000258
15. Getting the flu shot over multiple years has negative effects. Repeated previous vaccinations over multiple seasons had significant dose-dependent negative impacts on VE against both MA-fluA and MA-fluB. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/67/6/897/4924693?login=false
16. Vaccination was associated with a significantly higher risk of hospitalization with community-acquired pneumonia. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa022678
17. Vaccine-induced disease enhancement has been described in connection with several viral vaccines in animal models and in humans.
18. More flu shots may not be better. Dr. Edward Belongia and some colleagues at Wisconsin’s Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation reported that children who had been vaccinated annually over a number of years were more likely to contract the flu than kids who were only vaccinated in the season in which they were studied. https://www.statnews.com/2015/11/11/flu-shots-reduce-effectiveness
19. The 2016 Cochrane Review concluded that “[o]ffering influenza vaccination to HCWs [healthcare workers] based in long term care homes may have little or no effect on the number of residents who develop laboratory-proven influenza compared with those living in care homes where no vaccination is offered.” https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub5/abstract
20. "They found that children who had received the flu vaccine had three times the risk of hospitalization, as compared to children who had not received the vaccine.” https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090519172045.htm
21. A 2013 study finding “no evidence that vaccination prevented household transmission once influenza was introduced.” http://europepmc.org/article/PMC/3693492
Many employers, schools and organizations are working hard to mandate the Covid Vaccine to their employers and students. But is that legal? Luckily there are many incredible lawyers and health freedom advocates working hard to maintain our right to informed consent over our own bodies and over our children. The Informed Consent Action Network is one organization working with legal representation to fight the mandates. If your school or work place is coercing you into the shot, please contact their legal team for help!
In addition to organizations like ICAN, it's important to be in touch with your local Freedom Keepers or Informed Consent Coalitions. Many states have medical freedom organizations that work with local law makers to advocate for bills that would continue to allow you to make informed decisions. They also may advocate for politicians to vote no on bills that strip you of your medical freedom. Don't hesitate to reach out to local groups and to your local politicians to advocate for informed choice! It's more important now than ever to speak up, let your local politicians know how you feel and present to them the evidence and science that promote informed choice for medical procedures.
It is with a heavy heart we announce that Vaccination Re-Education Discussion Forum has been disabled on Facebook. We have requested a review, so we will see how that goes.
Please check back on this website often for updated information! You can also join us on other platforms: